Paralympian Actress calls out Dwayne Johnson’s role as an amputee in Skyscraper

Photos courtesy Morningstar Sargenti / Universal Pictures

Double amputee actress Katy Sullivan writes to Pacific Islander Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson for playing a disabled veteran

Actress, Paralympian, and double above-the-knee amputee from birth, Katy Sullivan has written an open letter to Dwayne Johnson for playing a disabled veteran who is an above the knee amputee. Sullivan's letter appeared on Deadline Hollywood on Monday. Sullivan, whose credits include such productions as My Name Is Earl, Last Man Standing and NCIS: New Orleans, wished Johnson a congratulatory note, but followed with a request that Johnson stop taking roles like the one in Skyscraper.

Your most recent film, Skyscraper, opens this weekend. Cheers! Congratulations! However, my request is for you to stop saying “Yes” to roles like the one in that movie. And here’s why…

Individuals with disabilities make up almost 20% of the world’s population. We are the largest minority and the “most marginalized group in Hollywood,” according to a 2017 study conducted by Fox, CBS and the Ruderman Family Foundation (an organization I know you are aware of and engaging with now). The study found that in last year’s TV season, less than 2% of characters were written to have a disability and of THOSE characters, 95% of the roles were filled with able-bodied actors.

The letter from Sullivan falls on the heels of Scarlett Johansson’s casting as a trans man in Rub & Tug. Johansson’s decision to accept the role sparked so much backlash and controversy that Johansson withdrew from the role. Johansson said in a statement that learned a lot from the LGBTQ community.

Marissa Martinelli, assistant editor at SLATE who also reported on the story, expressed it succinctly:

​While Hollywood is undergoing a (still very recent) reckoning when it comes to castingwhite actors in roles meant for people of colororcisgender actors as transgender characters, disability is routinely left out of the larger representation conversation. And Sullivan ... can speak to the effect on disabled actors when there are few disabled roles left available to them.

​Indian Country Today's own correspondent Lisa J. Ellwood, who is multiply-disabled, a disability-rights activist and is housebound, also contributed to the conversation via email:

"As with the likes of Scarlett Johansson and Eddie Redmayne in roles that should have gone to actors from the marginalized communities they were portraying, the standard defense of Dwayne Johnson [taking on the role of an amputee] in his latest film is “They wanted the name recognition and bankability that The Rock gives the movie.”

The films Moonlight & Get Out, proved that you don’t need big names in starring roles to have box office and critical success. The only way to discover new acting talent and make THEM bankable is by casting, says Ellwood.

Ellwood continued, "It’s worth noting that name recognition and bankability also comes through as a producer or director. A great example of this is 12 Years A Slave. Brad Pitt's production company backed the project and this in turn brought in more financing from other studios. Rather than taking a leading role, Pitt took on a small part. This allowed his name to be traded on to drum up interest. Yet he was also clear that it wasn’t his film. That’s a great model to follow."

"Johnson has enough star power to have done something similar. And given that some disabled film reviewers have said that the depiction of disability in this film is actually a step up from the usual narratives -- it would have been even more powerful with an amputee in the role. Playing a disabled character has always been one of the quickest routes to being taken more seriously as an actor and for awards — and it’s past time that disabled actors, writers, et al were given these opportunities. It’s nice that Johnson is now apparently calling for disabled actors to be given a shot, but I’m not sure that it would have even happened without the controversy," said Ellwood.

​What are your thoughts? Leave your comments below.

Follow Indian Country Today’s associate editor and senior correspondent, Vincent Schilling (Akwesasne Mohawk) on Twitter - @VinceSchilling

Email - vschilling@indiancountrytoday.com

Comments
No. 1-9
blu2cloud
blu2cloud

Yes, may the best actor get the part. Hollywood has many sins but the most egregious is that for decades of movies, commercials, anything depicting an American - real Americans have been excluded completely. In the past Europeans have depicted what an American looks like, talks like, & whatever else "Hollywood" thinks an American should be imaged as to the entire rest of the earth. So, for over the centuries the world has believed that an American is English, Irish, Scottish or some other European. Today, we still see Europeans depicted as Americans, as long as they talk like Americans. Many humans from other countries are learning how to, very well, speak great American English. Many from other countries are making movies pretending to be Americans showing Hollywood's version of an American. Even to this day I see Asians, Africans, East Indians, Puerto Ricans, Cubans depicted as Americans but the real Americans Mexican & Indian are still completely excluded from movies, commercials, anything that would show the rest of the earth what a genuine, indigenous American actually looks like.

DivineSpirit
DivineSpirit

It's called "Acting" folks. Just a role to be played in character. You don't need a genius to play Einstein. Now WE must deal with Trans-gender? And transgender wanting to take over the female identity and roles? NOT in my book! Barbie dolls are toys...peace

Gathly
Gathly

She's right, but this takes time, and it's a process. For there to be trans actors in trans roles, there first had to be trans roles, and those were played by cis people. This was the same process for black actors and native american actors. They were first played by people in black face or red face. They were usually always villains or idiots. The pressure is on now for trans roles going to trans actors. I think we can do the same for amputee actors. However, this film helps with that cause. Getting the amputee character as action hero is the first step. We get a few more of those, with non-disabled big stars, and then we can start pushing for real amputee actors to play those parts in the future. The roles have to exist first. There has to be an envelope, before you can push the envelope.

iceire
iceire

Wow,slamming Dwayne for doing an amputee part,where was the upset then when Gary Sinise did his character on Forest Gump,I swear yanks look for crap to complain about and if there is nothing they see to complain then they will create a situation just so they can whine.

Sagonige
Sagonige

Sometimes you cannot find actors with the disability so I can understand if someone who is not disabled is placed in the role and also for the bank ability. So I see both sides of it