New laws give victims more time to report rape or sexual assault – even Jeffrey Epstein’s

New laws give sex crime victims more time to come forward.(Photo: valentinsimon0, Pixabay)

Serious investments in prevention could substantially reduce losses related to criminal justice costs, health impairment, and loss of productivity says Jane E. Palmer

Jane E. Palmer

The #MeToo movement seems to be having a positive effect on sexual assault and rape victims’ willingness to report the crimes against them.

In 2017, 40.4 percent of victims of rape or sexual assault in the U.S. reported the crime to police, up from 23.2 percent in 2016.

New laws being passed around the country may increase these numbers even more by giving victims more time to seek justice in either criminal or civil court.

In 2019 alone, 20 states and the District of Columbia passed reforms, often despite opposition from the Catholic Church, which has been facing sex abuse allegations for decades.

A new law in New York state, the Child Victims Act allows those who were victims of sexual assault as a minor more time to report crimes – until age 28. The law also allows more time for victims to sue alleged perpetrators or negligent institutions – until age 55. Previously, the age limit for both types of cases was 23 with an exemption only for the most serious felonies.

The law also opens up a one-year window for victims of any age to file civil law suits, no matter how long ago the abuse occurred. This window opened on August 14.

Some states have gone even further. Last month, my home state of Illinois became the eighth state to completely eliminate statutes of limitation for sex crimes.

As a scholar of gender-based violence currently studying the legal needs of survivors of sexual assault, I believe that these reforms may help some victims find closure.

However, without examining why someone might wait decades to report a sexual assault, why sexual offenders are often not held accountable, and why so few resources are devoted to rape prevention, I believe that increasing – but not eliminating – time limits will not help most victims heal or access justice.

Barriers to reporting sexual assault

There are many reasons victims choose not to report an attack immediately, or ever.

In a recent study on sexual assault disclosure among college students, my co-author Noelle St. Vil and I found that 72 percent of victims told someone about the sexual assault, but only six percent reported to law enforcement. Victims were more likely to report if they were injured or their attacker was a stranger. This type of sexual assault is also the most likely to result in a conviction, but it is the least common type of assault.

Recent events, like Dr. Christine Blasey-Ford’s testimony before the Senate in September 2018, meant that calls to sexual assault hotlines spiked over 200 percent. Statutes of limitations meant that most of those callers likely had no legal recourse open to them.

The new law in New York state addresses that for many victims. It will also likely mean that more civil law suits will be filed against the estate of Jeffrey Epstein who died in federal jail August 10 awaiting trial on criminal charges of sexually abusing and trafficking girls over the past two decades.

‘Leaky pipeline’

More victims may be reporting and suing, but many studies have shown that the criminal legal system is a “leaky pipeline” where impunity for sexual offenders is common.

According to a 2018 investigative report that analyzed 1,300 sexual assault cases in Minnesota, 338 of these cases were sent to prosecutors by law enforcement. Charges were filed in 156 cases and only 91 of the original 1,300 resulted in a conviction.

Among assaults that were reported more than two days after the incident, only five percent resulted in conviction. Rape cases without evidence from a sexual assault forensic exam resulted in conviction just three percent of the time.

In Epstein’s 2019 criminal case, which won’t proceed because of his death, there were more than 1 million pages of evidence against him, including photos and victim testimonies.

It is more typical for cases to have little-to-no evidence, especially if it is years or decades after an attack.

Civil vs. criminal options for victims

In criminal court, the standard for conviction is to demonstrate that the abuse happened “beyond a reasonable doubt.” That’s difficult to do when victims do not report promptly or when there is no DNA collected or evidence of injury.

In the criminal system, a conviction means the defendant serves time in prison or jail, is put on probation or must register as a sex offender. But once charges are filed, the case is not in the victim’s control.

New York’s Child Victims Act, and similar reforms in other states, opens the door for more victims to pursue civil law suits instead of reporting to police. In civil cases, it has to be established that it is “more likely than not” that the abuse occurred. Victims can file suits to seek compensation for medical, legal or mental health costs or even gaps in employment due to depression or anxiety.

In 2002, California was the first state to offer a one-year window for victims to come forward in cases where the statue of limitations had run out. As a result, nearly US$1 billion was paid in civil lawsuit settlements by churches and insurance companies.

In many states, including New York, victims can also sue institutions like police departments, the Boy Scouts of America and even the Vatican.

Attorneys representing some of Epstein’s victims intend to proceed with filing suits against his estate, and it’s possible that his assets could be used for victim restitution.

Civil suits can be emotionally taxing for victims, costly and time-consuming, but the civil process offers victims more control over the case, including the ability to withdraw it.

Civil legal attorneys can also help victims with concrete needs related to housing, employment, immigration issues or educational access.

The cost of sexual assault

Some victims who take advantage of the Child Victims Act may be believed for the first time and that may help them heal from their trauma. But for many, statutes of limitation reforms are too late.

Every American rape takes an estimated $122,461 out of the economy over a victim’s lifetime, with the losses related to criminal justice costs, health impairment and loss of productivity. Over the nation’s population, that adds up to $3.1 trillion. Serious investments in prevention could substantially reduce these costs, and perhaps a foundation could use Epstein’s assets to do just that. And one day, perhaps #MeToo will be #NotNeeded.

Dr. Jane Palmer is the faculty director of the Community-Based Research Scholars program. In this role, she oversees a selective, living-learning community of first year students who learn how to conduct community-based research in collaboration with a local non-profit organization in DC. She also oversees the Undergraduate Certificate in Community-Based Research, which is open to all undergraduate students at American University.

Jane Palmer’s interdisciplinary research focuses on gender-based violence prevention, help-seeking, legal/policy responses to gender-based violence and measurement/methodological issues in research on sensitive topics. She was recently awarded a Research-to-Practice Fellowship to examine the civil legal needs of survivors of sexual assault for her ongoing collaboration with the Victim Rights Law Center in Boston.

She has conducted campus surveys on sexual assault, dating violence and bystander intervention since 2011. She is an evaluation consultant for Men Can Stop Rape on a federally-funded project on campus sexual assault prevention and policy initiatives at eight local universities.

Prior to joining the AU faculty full-time, she was a post-doctoral associate at the Center on Violence Against Women and Children (VAWC) at the Rutgers University School of Social Work. From 2010 – 2013, Dr. Palmer was a graduate research fellow at the U.S. Department of Justice’s National Institute of Justice where she was on a small team of individuals responsible for designing and implementing a Congressionally-mandated program of research on violence against American Indian and Alaska Native women living in tribal communities in the U.S. She served as a Technical Advisor to American Indian Development Associates on the National Baseline Study under this program of research from 2014-2017.

Before coming to AU for her Ph.D., she was the executive director of a domestic violence agency in St. Louis. She worked for more than a decade in community-based organizations in urban, low-income communities as an advocate, youth program manager and social worker for children and families, with an emphasis on violence prevention and eradicating sexual abuse and domestic violence.

Note: originally published at theconversation.com.

Comments