Massachusetts Man Awarded $72,500 Settlement After he was Arrested
A Massachusetts man who was arrested on wiretapping charges for video recording a cop in front of his home yelling profanities into a phone was awarded a $72,500 settlement Monday.
George Thompson, a lifelong cook, said he is investing the money into a food truck named Bozo’s – in honor of the cop who arrested him – Fall River police officer Thomas Barboza.
Barboza, who received a one-day suspension for the profanities, is more than welcome to dine at Bozo’s after it opens this summer, Thompson said in an interview with Photography is Not a Crime Monday evening.
“The first meal is on me,” said Thompson.
A generous offer considering Barboza is more than likely responsible for deleting the footage from Thompson’s iPhone after he seized it as “evidence” – not that he was ever charged with destruction of evidence.
But Barboza is unlikely to go near the food truck as he has been trying hard to avoid Thompson since he made the arrest on January 6, 2014, refusing to make eye contact with the 53-year-old man when the two run into each other at the local Dunkin Donuts near the Fall River courthouse on those days when he had hearings.
“He runs away,” Thompson said.
Thompson, it turned out, became his worst nightmare, hanging up a sign in front of his home that read, “bad cop, no donut #32,” on the day of his release from jail, keeping it there for more than a year – ignoring a request from a city councilwoman to remove it – taking it down only because he moved after his landlord decided to sell the place.
The 32 is Barboza’s badge number, a low number indicating he is an old-timer at the department. A man who has learned he can do what he wants, when he wants, all because he carries a badge.
But he finally met his match with Thompson, who said he will net $47,000 after the lawyers take their cut, a nice sum to launch his food truck business.
“I’m reinvesting in the city,” Thompson said.
On the day of his arrest in early January 2014, Thompson said that he was sitting on his front porch, noticing Barboza pacing back and forth speaking into his phone for almost an hour, saying “fuck” in almost every sentence.
After watching an elderly woman walking by who seemed offended by his words, Thompson told the cop to watch his language.
But Barboza told him to “shut the fuck up and mind your own business.”
That is when he pulled out his phone to record, which prompted Barboza to rush onto the property to arrest him.
“That’s right, I’m videotaping you,” Thompson told Barboza, according to the officer’s own arrest report, which also confirmed that Barboza was working off-duty security for a nearby construction company.
He then followed up that statement by writing that he noticed Thompson was holding the “phone to his chest area in a hiding motion.”
That last detail was crucial for Barboza to include in his report because Massachusetts wiretapping laws state that it is illegal to secretly record a person without their consent, even if that person has no expectation of privacy.
Of course, it’s a little difficult to prove a person is secretly recording you when they not only announce they are recording you, but they are holding the phone at chest level, which is the best way to keep it steady while handholding the phone.
And what the hell is a “hiding motion” anyway?
What happened was that Barboza noticed he was being recorded but did not appreciate being recorded, so he accused Thompson of secretly recording him. Cop logic. Twisting the truth without caring about the obviousness of it, knowing that cops investigate themselves.
Thompson said Barboza called him a “welfare bum” while arresting him, an accusation Barboza denied to internal affairs.
However, Barboza did admit to telling Thompson that he was going to “fuck him hard on paper,” which is basically an admission that he was going to fabricate facts. There is no other way to decipher that statement.
But even in his report, he managed to fuck himself harder than he fucked Thompson.
And it gets even more absurd.
At some point while the iPhone was in police custody, the phone was reset to default factory settings, a development that police tried to blame on Thompson, saying he did so remotely.
The Fall River Police Department then hired a forensics expert who determined all the files on the phone were deleted prior to it being restored to default settings. But the expert was unable to determine when the files were deleted, so you get the picture. The files were deleted but they couldn’t prove police deleted the footage, even though they were the ones in possession of the phone the entire time.
It wasn’t like Thompson was able to delete all the files as Barboza was pouncing on him to shove him in the back of a police car.
Fall River police returned his phone on May 28, 2014 and internal affairs eventually determined there was no “malicious intent” behind the arrest or the deletion of the footage, concluding that the footage was “inadvertently” deleted because the cops kept trying to enter the pass-coded phone but failing.
No, you really can’t make this stuff up. It’s all there in the discovery in reports signed by Lieutenant Ronald Furtado.
The bottom line is this. Barboza had no right to arrest Thompson. And he had no right to seize his camera as evidence. And Fall River police had no right to tamper with his phone unless they had obtained a subpoena.
The 72-page report states that Thompson eventually gave them the passcode to his phone, which I have yet to confirm with him as he is now sleeping, but that passcode was given to them on January 15, 2014, nine days after his arrest and seven days after the phone had already been wiped clean of all files and restored to factory settings.
The wiretapping charges against Thompson were dismissed in April 2014 but his phone was not returned to him until the following month because they insisted upon a court order, according to the Bay State Examiner, who tried to interview Barboza, only for him to hop in his car and drive away as you can see in the video below.
Yet the Fall River Police Department never sough a court order to view the contents of Thompson’s phone.
He said he was offered a settlement of $50,000 in August of 2015, but he demanded $60,000.
That was when he was told they would settle with him in 2016 because they did not want the settlement to influence the upcoming November 2015 election of Mayor Sam Sutter, who happened to be the district attorney trying to prosecute him for the wiretapping charges only a year earlier.
It’s a clusterfuck of a city and Thompson said he is not going to stop his rabble-rousing. He still wants to hold Barboza and the police department accountable for deleting his footage, so he plans on attending the next city council meeting and hand out copies of the 72 pages of discovery.
Besides the one-day suspension for cursing, Barboza was forbidden from working off-duty security detail for 15 days.
The real crime besides the unlawful arrest is the illegal destruction of evidence. Barboza may never be disciplined for that, but he will also never live that one down.
UPDATE: David Milton, George Thompson’s attorney, briefly spoke with PINAC by phone. Milton, a prominent Boston civil rights attorney, has long been associated with the right to record. He was part of the team that represented Simon Glik, whose lawsuit against the Boston Police Department set a precedent that recording police is protected by the First Amendment.
Of Thompson’s settlement, Milton had this to say:
The settlement is a great result and a vindication of Mr. Thompson’s—and all of our—right to record police in public … Hopefully the money will result in better training for police officers to not arrest people who record them and also not to delete footage of them when taking cell phones into custody … Fall River and other cities around the Commonwealth need to recognize that it is perfectly legal and it’s a constitutional right for people to record officers doing their duties in public. And George Thompson deserves credit for fighting back against the police department that violated his rights.